Inspired By Ken Burns And FDR…

Mark Schwiebert makes the case for investing in major public works projects:

“We did this during the New Deal in the 1930s with the massive public works programs…But we haven’t done anything similar since.”

Gee, I wonder why?

Oops! Bloated government happened! Which is something FDR never had to deal with. The reason these WPA-type projects cannot be done today is:

1. Labor unions would not allow any workers to make less than union wage, driving up costs to unsustainable levels. Suspend Bacon-Davis and then let’s talk.

2. EPA. Think about how environmental impact studies would halt any progress on a “public works program”

3. NIMBY. Think about how long and how costly these “public works programs” could be held up in court over NIMBY objections.

4. Massive bureaucracy. It has been evident for some time that the federal government is so massive as to be unworkable and unmanagable—Obama said so himself. How long would it take for these projects to navigate all the red tape unelected bureaucrats created?

Schwiebert says all this could be financed with a federal gas tax increase, a sales tax on internet transactions and returning the income tax to the levels of that go-go era, the 1970s.


FDR had it easy—he didn’t have to deal with the bureaucracy he helped create.

Oh yeah, and this idea isn’t exactly original either. In December 2009 Phil Hare proposed the “New Deal For A New Economy Act”, which went exactly nowhere.

I understand all this nostalgia for FDR and for a time when government really worked, but he is part of the reason we can’t have nice things anymore.


Author: qcexaminer

None of your damned business.

3 thoughts on “Inspired By Ken Burns And FDR…”

  1. The Burns doc was just one looooong valentine and puff piece on FDR, his missus and liberalism in general. There was absolutely NO downside presented to the policies of the New Deal and a good dose of Jim Powell or Amity Shlaes would have gone a long way to make this doc more than a leftwing cartoon.

    Also, while Burns played up GOP opposition, Democrat dissenters were omitted and ignored. People forget how radical the New Deal was in its day and FDR’s VP from ’33-’41 was shocked and angered to discover that FDR intended to make the New Deal permanent rather than suspend it once the economy improved. So angered that he ran against him, thinking FDR surely would not run for a third term.

    It would take a constitutional amendment to right THAT wrong!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s