In a series of interviews Nancy Pelosi set out her agenda in the event the Democrats gain control of the House:
1. …comprehensive affordable, quality childcare for working mothers
2. …comprehensive immigration reform
3. …combat the climate crisis
4. …create jobs and strengthen the middle class
5. …[Washington Redskins] change their name.
Hey, you don’t have to be detached from reality to be a Democrat, but it helps!
As per #l, does anyone really think “comprehensive, affordable, quality childcare” will be any more successful than comprehensive affordable quality Obamacare? Quality? Affordable? Both? Not enough money on the planet to make that happen. And what about working fathers? Oh yeah, forgot—they are oppressors who deserve NOTHING!
#2. I’m sure the Democrats “can’t wait” for all those new undocumented Democrat voters in ’16. Amnesty is NOT popular with the public, but then, neither is any of the liberal agenda.
#3 Yeah, the Democrats need another vote on Cap and Tax since that worked out so well for Phil Hare and other Democrats when they voted for this anti-science scam.
#4 Too bad the entire Obama agenda, including but especially Obamacare hurts the middle class. If Pelosi/Reid/Obama had a plan to “create jobs” they would have proposed something by now. As it is, the only jobs the Dems are interested in is taxpayer-funded public sector jobs.
#5 As for the Redskins “controversy”, personally I don’t give a damn since I don’t care about sports, but Mr.Examiner suggests they call themselves The Washington Rednecks because rednecks don’t give a hoot about all that identity politics/politically correct bullsh*t.
But all my bloviation has a practical QC application too. Cheri Bustos should be asked early and often about how she would vote on Pelosi’s leftwing wacko wish list, and how Bustos would propose to pay for “comprehensive affordable, quality childcare” for women only, if she is for amnesty, if she would support Cap and Tax like Hare, and explain how Obamacare “creates jobs and strengthens the middle class”—and hey, how ’bout them Redskins?